This appeal under Section 96 CPC is directed against the judgment and final decree dated 19.8.1985 passed by the Additional District Judge, Bhilwara, whereby in a suit for rendition of accounts, the Court passed a decree for payment of a sum of Rs.15,944.99 P. alongwith interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the suit i.e. 20.10.1964.

The facts in brief may be noticed thus : the plaintiff- respondent filed a suit for rendition of accounts against the appellant-defendant. A preliminary decree dated 21.4.1969 was passed for rendition of accounts for the period from 16.7.1962 to 13.8.1963, the preliminary decree was confirmed by this Court by its judgment dated 15.3.1979 passed in S.B. Civil Regular 2 First Appeal No.92/1969. On passing of the preliminary decree, the trial court appointed a Commissioner to look into the accounts produced by the parties, who submitted his report dated 3.1.1983 inter-alia reporting that the Enterprise sustained a loss of Rs.11,282.86 P. as per the profit and loss account, there were some debtors of the Company, but since the limitation for enforcing the liability had expired nothing could be recovered and came to th

                                                    S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.616/2014
                                            Ramu Ram Siyag Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

                                                                    Order dt: 29/09/2014
                                      1/4


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

                             AT JODHPUR



                                ORDER



                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.616/2014
           Ramu Ram Siyag Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.



DATE OF ORDER                   :::                       29th September 2014


                             PRESENT

              HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI

Appearance:

Mr. C.S. Bissa, for the petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Mehta, Addl. Govt. Counsel.
                                    --

BY THE COURT:

1. The petitioner has approached this Court assailing the inaction on the part of the respondents for wrong fixation in the selection grades to him. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition in this Court on 22.01.2014 seeking following relief(s): -

"It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction respondents be directed to :-

(I)Respondents be directed to declare petitioner to be entitled for grant of Second selection scale of Rs.5000-8000 on completion of 18 years of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.616/2014 Ramu Ram Siyag Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

1. Both the learned Senior Advocate Mr. G.R. Punia with Mr. Yashpal Khileree appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Manish Patel, Additional Government Counsel submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition stands covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Barkat Ali & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., SBCWP NO. 5481/2014 along with three other writ petitions, decided recently on 26.09.2014.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner on 06.06.2014 with the following prayers:-

"It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that Your S

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the parties are agreed that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by the decision of a coordinate bench of this Court in the case of Dr. P.D.

Purohit Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No.3767/2010, decided on 23.09.2011). The issue raised in the present writ petition is in relation to inclusion of period of service rendered by the incumbent/petitioner in the Government Department (Animal Husbandry Department) prior to his deputation and absorption in the respondent- Dairy.

3. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in this Court on 05.04.2012 with the following prayers: -

"It is, therefore, respectf

1. The petitioner - Arun Kumar Kashyap had filed this writ petition in this Court on 23/8/1997 for the following reliefs claimed by him in the writ petition.

"(a) by an appropriate writ, order or direction Annexure No.16 dt. 11.10.96 be set aside/quashed.

(b) That petitioner be given pension and other past retiral benefits as per his qualifying service till the date of retirement.

(c ) any other apporpriate writ, order or direction which in the facts and circumstances of the case, may be deemed just and proper be issued in favour of the petitioner."

2. While admitting the petition of the petitioner on 15/9/1997, a SBCWP No.3449/97 - Arun Kumar Kashyap vs. State & Ors.

Order dt:30/9/2014 2/21 coordinat

The city of Udaipur, nestled in a beautiful valley of Aravali Hills, is well known for its natural as well as artificial beauty. Being situated at the bank of lake of Pichhola and Fateh Sagar, the city is also known as "City of Lakes". The city is attracting a huge number of tourists from every corner of globe. The lakes situated in Udaipur city and in nearby area are not only attracting the tourists but are like life time of the residents of Udaipur.

In a well known English Newspaper "The Times of India" (Jaipur edition) dated October 8, 2014, a news item with a title "Dirty lakes, dead fish mark end of festive season" appeared, giving details of the ills suffered by the lakes of Udaipur city due to ignorance of the residents of the city. The news so appear reads as under :-

"Udaipur : Turning a deaf ear towards the appeals made by the administration, nature lovers and activists to refrain from performing rituals at -2- ghats, people who hosted Garba functions at various colonies and localities of the city, immersed idols of deities in the l

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, Narendra Singh Chundawat S/o Sh. Onkar Singh, in this court on 27.09.2013 with the following prayers:-

"It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed by the petitioner before your Lordships that; this writ petition filed by the petitioner, may kindly be allowed with cost and;

(a). By an appropriate writ order or direction, in S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6935/2014. Narendra Singh Chundawat Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Order dated 08/10/2014 2/4 the nature thereof; the respondents may very kindly be directed to consider the case of petitioner for his transfer, nea

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in this court on 22.09.2014 with the following prayers:-

"It is, therefore, humbly and most respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs and by issuing appropriate writ, order or direction:-

A. The respondents may kindly be directed to prepare fresh merit list of Teacher Grade-III Level II subject Social Studies; and B. The respondents may kindly be directed to give appointment to the petitioner on the post of Teacher Grade III Level II subject Social Studies w.e.f. the S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6916/2014.

Kana Ram Kachhawaha Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

                                  S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7019/2014.
                              Kamal Hasan     Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
                                                                         ...
                                                   Final Order dated 08.10.2014
                                   1/2




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

                              AT JODHPUR.


                               :: ORDER ::


              S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7019/2014.
                Kamal Hasan       Vs.       State of Rajasthan & Ors.
                                    ..


Date of Order                           ::::::          8th October, 2014.

                          PRESENT

            HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI

Appearance:

Mr. N.R. Choudhary, for the petitioner.
                                    --
BY THE COURT:

1. The petitioner working as Senior Teacher is aggrieved by the impugned transfer order posting him at Government Higher Secondary School, Kushalpura vide Annexure-7 dated 02.10.2014 passed by the District Education Officer (Secondary), Pali.

2. Normally, this Court does not interfere in the matter of transfer and posting because it is purely an administrative matter to be looked into by the Department/Authority concerned and, therefore, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the present S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7019/2014. Kamal Hasan Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

...

Final Order dated 08.10.2014

1. The controversy involved in the present case is that after recruitment process for the post of Teacher Grade-II was initiated by the respondent Rajasthan Public Service Commission vide Advertisement Annexure-P/2 dated 02.08.2013, the State Government by a general Notification

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, Ms. Sonam Chaudhary D/o Sh. Balwant Singh Chaudhary in this court on 26.09.2014 with the following prayers:-

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6912/2014. Sonam Chaudhary Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission & Anr.

Order dated 08/10/2014 2/3 "It is, therefore, prayed that by appropriate writ, order or direction:-

I. The respondents may kindly be directed to treat the correct answer of question No.9, 19 and 146 of the question paper Annexure-P/4, supplied by the petitioner and they may be further directed to provide

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner in this court on 22.09.2014 with the following prayers:-

"It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by appropriate writ, order or direction:

(i)the respondents may kindly be directed to recheck S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 6711/2014. Dharmendra Kanswa Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

Order dated 08/10/2014 2/3 the OMR sheet of the petitioner as per the questions attempted by him as well as answer key issued by the respondents.

(ii)The respondents may kindly be directed to provide the appointment

1. The petitioner, Feroz Khan S/o Sh. Mehboob Khan, has preferred this writ petition in this Court on 09.08.2011 seeking following relief/s: -

"It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordship may be pleased to allow this writ petition and -

a) by an appropriate writ, order or direction, be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 20.6.2011 (Annex.2) and charge sheet (Annexure-3);

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7453/2011. Feroz Khan Vs. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur & Anr.

Order dated 08/10/2014

1. The petitioner, Ramniwas S/o Sh. Chena Ram Bishnoi, has preferred this writ petition in this Court on 10.01.2013 seeking following relief(s): -

"It is, therefore, humbly and respectfully prayed that this writ petition of the petitioner may kindly be allowed: -

A. By an appropriate writ order or direction, order dated 26.10.2012 (Annex.4) & 29.10.2012 (Annex.5) may kindly be quashed being devoid of authority of law.

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 494/2013. Ramniwas Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

                                                 Order dated 08/10/2014

1. The petitioner working as 'Gram Rozgar Sahayak' in Gram Panchayat- Bhanuja, Tehsil: Nathdwara, has preferred the present writ petition against the non-extension of his contractual employment by the impugned order dated 22.09.2014 (Annex.19) passed by the District Collector-cum-Coordinator of the said Scheme EGS, Rajsamand.

2. Mr. Arjun Purohit, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was working as 'Gram Rozgar S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7094/2014.

Mangilal Balai Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Order dated 09/10/2014 2/3 Sahayak' since 2008 and merely on the basis of complaint and holding preliminary enquiry on the basis of 5 (five) affidavits taken from different complainants, without considering the version given by the petit

1. The petitioner, Smt. Dhanwanti Dewani, who is working as Office Assistant in Government Polytechnic College, Jodhpur, has preferred this writ petition against the impugned transfer order dated 03.10.2014 (Annex.2) transferred her from Govt. Polytechnic College, Jodhpur to Govt. Polytechnic College, Bagidora, District: Banswara.

2. Mr. Girish Sankhala, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the at the verge of retirement as the petitioner is 59 years and 4 months of age as of now, the petitioner has been sought to be transferred from Govt. Polytechnic College, Jodhpur to Govt. Polytechnic College, S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7079/2014.

Smt. Dhanwanti Dewani Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Order dated 09/10/2014 2/2 Bagidora, Banswara. The peti

1. The petitioner being graduate and having the qualification of B. Ed. applied for the post of Teacher Grade II (Sanskrit) in pursuance of the Advertisement dated 02.08.2013 (Annex.2). The petitioner belongs to TSP area being the resident of District Basnwara. It has further been averred by the petitioner although he belongs to TSP area, however, in the on-line application there was no criteria laid down in the format of the application form regarding the category of TSP. In the aforesaid competitive examination, the petitioner secured 344.02 marks, whereas the cut off marks for the post of Teacher Grade-II (Sanskrit) SC category was 353.84 and for the TSP (General) the S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7056/2014.

Rajendra Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Order dated 09/10/2014 2/3 cut off marks were 320

1. The petitioner applied for the post of Teacher Gr.-II (Hindi) in the selection process of Teacher Grade-II Competitive Examination, 2013 and she belongs to category of General Women (Physically handicapped) (Hearing Impaired). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner secured in the said examination 173.64 marks vide Annex.6 mark sheet S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7052/2014.

Prem Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Order dated 09/10/2014 2/3 (Page 26 of the paper book) but in the remarks column of the said mark sheet, it has been written 'not selected' in the said selection process. Learned counsel for the petitioner also drew the attention of the Court towards the Notification dated 19.09.2014 (Annex.5) issued by the Rajasthan Public Service Commissioner, Ajmer, in which in horizontal reserva

1. The petitioner being graduate and having the qualification of B. Ed. applied for the post of Teacher Grade II (English) in pursuance of the Advertisement dated 02.08.2013 (Annex.2). The petitioner belongs to TSP area being the resident of District Dungarpur. It has further been averred by the petitioner although she belongs to TSP area, however, in the on-line application there was no criteria laid down in the format of the application form regarding the category of TSP. In the aforesaid competitive examination, the petitioner secured 297.27 marks, whereas the cut off marks for the post of Teacher Grade-II (English) General women was 332.49 and for the TSP (General S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7013/2014.

Jaya Sevak Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Order dated 09/10/2014 2/3 Women) the cut off mark

1. The petitioner being graduate and having the qualification of B. Ed. applied for the post of Teacher Grade II (Mathematics) in pursuance of the Advertisement dated 02.08.2013 (Annex.2). The petitioner belongs to TSP area being the resident of District Banswara. It has further been averred by the petitioner although he belongs to TSP area, however, in the on-line application there was no criteria laid down in the format of the application form regarding the category of TSP. In the aforesaid competitive examination, the petitioner secured 143.84 marks, whereas the cut off marks for the post of Teacher Grade- II (Mathematics) General category was 185.33 and for the TSP S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7012/2014.

Dilip Kumar Purohit Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

Order dated 09/10/2014 2/3